Briefly
|
Friday, 19 October 2007 |
This, my friends, is why we need laws about Net Neutrality. Independent testing shows that Comcast, the second largest Internet service provider, actively interferes with BitTorrent
file sharing by its customers. BitTorrent, while sometimes used
for the illegal transfer of copyrighted material, is also used by
hundreds of legitimate companies and organizations to quickly
distribute large files. For example, OpenOffice.org, Ubuntu
Linux, and other organizations with large downloadable products each
offer and encourage downloading with BitTorrent. I'd bet that
Verizon and other ISPs discriminate against BitTorrent traffic too (I
am starting to have strange issues sharing legal 'torrents'
myself). I have a right to use my Internet connection for
whatever kind of legal data traffic I want, and it is time to protect
that right by law. |
Last Updated ( Friday, 19 October 2007 )
|
|
Opinion
|
Saturday, 22 July 2006 |
If
you watch much TV, you have probably heard a lot of advertising blather
(primarily from the cable and phone companies) talking about 'net
neutrality' and—at least in this area—most of the ads are talking about
how terrible an idea it is. One ad that runs in regular rotation
around here claims, in tones reminiscent of a negative political
campaign, that neutrality legislation would give Google an unfair
competitive advantage at consumers' expense. According to
interest groups representing the Internet Service Providers (ISPs), net
neutrality would set back innovation and hobble the Internet with
needless regulation. But this is a merely a fabrication crafted
by some very talented liars. |
Last Updated ( Friday, 19 October 2007 )
|
Read more...
|
|
Briefly
|
Saturday, 13 October 2007 |
Karin Chenoweth writes in the Washington Post this morning exactly what needs to be said about the 'No Child Left Behind'
(NCLB) law. The oft-ballyhooed line that teachers must now 'teach
to the test' and fail to do anything original or creative in their
teaching may be true, but teachers teaching to a test is better than
the pre-NCLB situation where most teachers didn't bother to teach
anything at all. It's a curious bit of revisionist history to
pretend our schools were any better before NCLB than they are
today. They weren't. We need a wholesale redesign of how we
educate people in this country, and NCLB was a [very small] step in the
right direction. My only major complaint about NCLB is that it
does far too little. |
|